Posted May 28, 2014 - 10:55
Subscribers may be interested in the latest newsletter from the Centre for Liveable Cities in Singapore:
|
|
May 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITIES SCANNING is taking a break The CLC is revamping our CITIES SCANNING publication series and will be back in July after the World Cities Summit. What do you hope to see in this new series? Share your thoughts here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perspectives In his lecture, Mr Harrison said Singapore is very "well managed" but its people are less able to create solutions. We asked lecture audience members: "Do you think it's true and what are some ways to address this limitation?" This is what some of them said:
|
|
Creativity in Policy Making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The Singapore government has been very creative in urban planning and design - the creation of the Marina Bay Sands and Gardens by the Bay; the transformation of Ang Mo Kio-Bishan Park, My Waterway Punggol and the policy formulation of providing affordable public housing for all (including singles).Well-planned and designed towns have also won many international awards." - Ms Maria Boey, President, Institute of Parks and Recreation, Singapore (2010-2014) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education influences Creativity |
|
|
|
|
|
"Most Singaporeans do have some difficulties thinking "out of the box", and seem more at ease following a tried-and-tested route, which could be due to our education system. However, with the maturing of a young nation [and] with the government supporting the arts and culture, we would hopefully be able to make some inroads in this area in time to come." - Ms Sharon Cheong, Manager, Corporate Communications, National Heritage Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements to Solutions is a form of Creativity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There may not be many "fully original" creative ideas from Singapore, but how we make incremental improvements to solutions is creative in its own right." - Mr Lim Buey Shyan, Senior Vice President (Project Services / Township Development), Sembcorp Development Ltd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lessons From Hong Kong |
Singapore and Hong Kong (HK) are similar in many ways. Both are highly urbanised and dense, and are at a relatively stable stage of development. What are the key differences between the cities and how can Singapore learn from HK's best practices? Twenty-nine participants from CLC's Executive Development and Growth Exchange (EDGE)* Programme studied these questions and shared three key takeaways as part of the overseas study-trip component in the 3-week EDGE programme with the Centre.
|
|
Hongkongers come first: Through discussions with various government departments in HK, the consistent message was the strong interest the HK government has for its citizens. In particular, HK has a small foreign workforce as the priority is on providing employment opportunities for locals. Foreign workforce is concentrated to specific sectors that consistently face local manpower shortage, and this policy went through a very thorough consultation involving the government, unions and employers. These sectors are deemed the 3D industries ("dangerous, dirty and demanding"), such as construction and elderly care sectors. |
Public consultation: The HK Government takes public consultations very seriously, and has put in place systems and structures to ensure that the peoples' voices are heard. While it may slow down the decision-making process, this sincere effort has allowed the government to engage the people more effectively as Hongkongers are happy to share their views with the government via media channels and support groups. Strength of civil society: A legacy of the British, the civil society is empowered such that they play an active role in the development of HK. For example, the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HKHA) provides housing for lower income groups while the private sector meets the needs of the affluent; a not-for-profit organisation like the Hong Kong Housing Society (HKHS) complements the work of the HKHA by providing housing options for the "sandwiched" class. *EDGE programme is conducted twice a year for promising officers from the Infrastructure & Environment (I&E) Sector in Singapore slated for the Public Sector Leadership Programme. As part of the first run of the 2014 programme, participants went on a study trip to Tianjin Eco-city and Hong Kong to understand and learn about their experience in urban development.
|
|
|
|
|