Search for...

Author Information

John Tibbitt's picture
Offline

The 'Big Society'

One of the (dare I say it) 'big ideas' of the Conservative Party's election campaign, now incorporated into the new UK coalition government thinking, is the replacement of 'big government' by the 'big society'.   Although not explained much at the time of the election, and dismissed subsequently by the opposition as the 'do-it-yourself-society', necessitated as a consequence of severe cuts in public expenditure,  the policies behind the slogan are beginning to emerge.  David Cameron spoke recently of devolving power from central government to local government and to communities through public service reform,   a plan to establish a 'bank' to help support locally run projects, a web-based local information facility and designated some community-led projects as initial pilot projects, to be taken forward assisted 'with advice of civil servants'. 

All of this looks very top-down as formulated so far,  but implies a huge cultural shift in communities if  people are expected to support third sector organisations, develop social enterprises, increase volunteering, and embrace social action.  Policy announcements so far are still very short on how such a change will be facilitated,  and indeed on what will change public expectations of the respective roles of government and community, and from where  community strength will be derived to enable the enhanced community action.

The focus of PASCAL on place, social capital and the role of learning are central to these latter questions and it seems we have a ready-made opportunity to present a policy analysis relevant to this change, drawing on international perspectives. The close relationship between learning, place, social capital and innovation has been explored in several of the PASCAL publications (eg Duke et al 2005 and Doyle et al 2008).  The reduced availability of public funds will force some kind of adaptation in communities.  Current debates about 'de-growth',  the emergence of 'transition towns' in response to 'peak oil' and environmental challenges,  the growth of community-based social networking,  and emerging learning communities all offer perspectives on strengthening communities and community action in the context of 21st century urban (and sometimes more rural) locations which can be drawn upon to develop a policy agenda which can make this adaption positive for individuals and communities, and maybe even for the national economy more broadly.

With some PASCAL Associates I am starting to try to do this now.   Please contribute to this process.

References:

Duke C, Osborne M & Wilson B (eds),(2005): Rebalancing the social and the economic: Learning Patnership and Place, Leicester, NIACE 

Doyle L, Adams D, Tibbitt J and Welsh P (eds) (2008): Building Stronger Communities: Connecting research policy and practice, Leicester, NIACE

 

Comments

New Economics Foundation

Dear John,

You may be interested in this blog from Anna Coote from the New Economics Foundation

http://www.neweconomics.org/blog/2010/07/19/camerons-big-society-will-le...

in the context of the Big Society. I'm sure that there's much more out there.

Mike

The Big Economy

Thanks Mike.  Here is some more from NEF which raises the possibility of applying Big Society principles to the economy (from the BIg Society Network website).

The Big Economy?

July 5th, 2010


The New Economic Foundation (NEF) raised an intriguing prospect recently: exporting the aims of the Big Society to the economy.  Economic reform is outside The Big Society Network’s focus but the NEF are picking up on an important theme.

As Tim Smit has argued, the answer to our climate challenge is the same as the answer to some of our community challenges 400 hourses with 400 lawns usually have 400 lawnmowers  but one could do if it was shared.

However,  the NEF goes further, thinking about the macro-economy too. Writing here Anna Coote argues that:

The central principle underpinning the vision for a Big Society – that power should be decentralised and people enabled run their own affairs locally – should be extended to the economy

What would that look like? nef and others have suggested a few ways:

- More democratic models of corporate governance.  [Demos’ Reinventing the Firm brings together the latest research]

- continuing the push on financial education

- Action on monopolies, which Phillip blond is exploring.

- decentralising growth aware from the overheated southeast.  [The Government’s Regional Growth Fund is a step in the right direction.]

– New thinking to understand the changing nature of work, such as the Work Foundation’s Good Work Commission.

- Fair lending to poorer areas, perhaps along the lines of US legislation, [recently advocated for the UK here ].

- Clearer labelling

- making it easier to run co-operatives and other forms of shared ownership.  [Mutuo's Commission on Ownership is one effort.]

Is this enough to add up to a ‘Big Economy’? What is missing?

Jonty Olliff-Cooper, Big Society Network

Answering common concerns about a bigger society

July 5th, 2010


The New Economic Foundation has just released a short note outlinging its hopes and fears for the Big Society here.

The Big Society Network is already working on several of the concerns the report raises. We will be posting replies to some of the specifics over the next few days.

Jonty Olliff-Cooper

 


 

Click the image to visit site

Click the image to visit site

X